After all, the Xbox 360 and PS3 had strengths in particular games, but both platforms ended up in very similar positions in the end. For now, the PS4 retains a significant quality and speed
\n \n how much more powerful is ps4 than ps3
The PS3 includes a Blu-ray player, which allows you to watch high-definition, while the PS2 does not. The PS3 also has built-in WiFi capabilities, which allow you to connect to the internet, while the PS2 requires a separate network adapter. The PS3 is a more advanced gaming console than the PS2. Sony Computer Entertainment produces the most The PS4 is a more powerful than the NES. Lets say it is x times as powerful. So PS4 = xNES. Cancelling the S on both sides of the equation means that 4P = xNE. Therefore x = 4P/NE. This is how powerful the PS4 is compared with the NES.

PS5 has some neat features, and the controller is really nice, but it feels much, much closer to the PS4 than the PS2 felt to the PS1, or the PS3 felt to the PS2. Its not helped by how much more complex games are, and how they target wider ranges of hardware than before, either. 13. kleinepoepjes • 1 yr. ago.

The PS3 had a unique cell processor (a single core at 3.2 GHz with 7 smaller assistance cores) where as the Xbox 360 had something like a tri-core processor each running at 3.2 GHz. It was always assumed that the PS4 was more powerful due to the cell processor, but I read a computer article that explained how the Xbox 360's hardware was more
Emulation requires significantly more powerful hardware than the hardware you are emulating. That's why even the best computers today still are struggling with PS3. Your best bet is to wait for Nixxes to port Sony's library of exclusives to PC. That'll happen long before handhelds are powerful enough to emulate PS4.
No wonder why the PS4 couldn't pull it off with its weak Jaguar CPU cores, but doubtless Sony have developed a PS3 emulator of their own. In theory the PS5 should have the necessary CPU grunt to emulate PS3 games much better than RPCS3 on PC, but I doubt Sony will bother with making their emulator available on PS5.
1PE + 7x SPE POWER (RISC) @ 3.2 GHz is more powerful than 8x x86_64 (CISC) @ 1.6 GHz? I'm not even talking about rendering capacity, because you appear to have completely disregarded the Broadband Engine.
PS2 used a very weird processor setup that was hard to develop for and hard to emulate. Its quite possible we could have a PS3 or 360 emulator before PS2 emulators are fully working. Either way though, we are quite a few years off from either having a playable emulator. Good emulation involves more than just cpu power. yNqX.
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/382
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/208
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/41
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/425
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/491
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/31
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/31
  • 41vspk1dy4.pages.dev/467

    • how much more powerful is ps4 than ps3